Introduction to My Work

What is a communizer? Why did I choose my name?

Greetings.

I’ve been following the work of this amazing free thinker, probably one of the most important and consequential thinkers of our history, named Wade Frazier, who just started posting in Substack a year ago. It is his decision to post in Substack that made me decide to create my own Substack account to try my hand in this, but it is mostly for me to have my own creative outlet and to be freer in expressing my opinions on a variety of topics, not just on free energy. But it is his work on the existence of free energy and its century-long suppression, along with his own adventures related to it, that motivated me to create my own account and naming it “The Free Energy Communizer”.

But my story with Wade dates back thirteen years ago when I first encountered his American Empire essay in his website, ahealedplanet.net. Wade said that the American Empire essay happens to be the most read section of his website so he’s not surprised as to how I encountered his work. But it’s more than just that. Reading on his website over the course of a few months around mid-2012 has changed my life (for the better, I am sure) and a lot of my beliefs have been challenged regarding the way that our world works and all of this was happening on the backdrop of the failures of the Occupy Wall Street movement and my own dissatisfaction with the Obama administration’s reluctance to introduce more economically progressive policies, which we are paying the price today. But it is Noam Chomsky, Pearl Jam, Chris Hedges, William Blum, Richard Wolff, Cornell West, Nirvana and Rage Against the Machine that moved me away from Obama liberalism to socialism around 2011. So as a baby leftist, Wade’s “Open Letter to the Radical Left” resonated with me and it cemented my acceptance of Wade’s life story as something that really happened. The very few interviews that Wade did back then that I found in the Internet also further cemented my conversion. Steven Greer’s “Disclosure Project” also helped me in this when I first encountered it in Youtube around early 2012, if I remember correctly, and I even remember watching him talking about UFOs and aliens in the Joe Rogan podcast, among his other material in Youtube. That Joe Rogan interview is probably something I watched for the first time either in Youtube or in Daily Motion but I can’t remember anymore. This was before Joe Rogan became the Joe Rogan that we know today. Of course, my own life story assisted in this process. Without the things that I’ve experienced and encountered before reading Wade’s work, I wouldn’t be able to believe Wade’s life story and accept his ideas and digest them properly. And even then I don’t think all of his ideas have truly sink in with me until a little over a year ago on the backdrop of the post-Covid years and the ongoing genocide in Gaza and the war in Ukraine. My guess is that I just need more life experiences after encountering Wade’s work until I feel like I have a good emotional grasp and acceptance of such writings. Seeing the defeat of Bernie Sanders and Jeremy Corbyn along with the suppression of the Left in my own home country further disabused me of lingering beliefs that left-wing activism can provide an indirect avenue towards giving us free energy. I already know of this, in theory, since I identified myself in the past as an anarchist or a libertarian socialist, and you can see this nominal acceptance of the futility of such activism if you read my writings in Wade’s thread in Project Avalon back then in the late 2010s but it hasn’t truly sink in yet and it hasn’t hit me yet emotionally. I accepted them intellectually since 2012 but I don’t think I truly accepted that there is no political route to free energy discourse, however indirect or accidental the path might be, and I continued hoping that the world can become a somewhat better place that it allows a road to disclosure to suddenly open, maybe miraculously, despite the challenges that a Bernie Sanders administration in the United States or a Jeremy Corbyn government in the United Kingdom may face from the capitalist elites. I was still hoping that a social democratic government in a core capitalist country can stumble into the world getting free energy. So I have to see for myself the defeat of a resurrecting social democratic movement and this surge of far-right politics everywhere in the world before I can truly accept that the electoral/parliamentary political road is an absolute dead end. I should have known better but I was still trapped in the Left vs Right paradigm. “Left is Best”, as said by the renowned Left thinker and podcaster, the late Michael Brooks. Michael Brooks died in mid-2020, which I personally believe is more a “deep state” assassination rather than a rare blood clot. Nobody questioned the cause of his death from among his friends and his loved ones but I believe that whatever suspicions that they may have about Michael Brooks’ death that they just chose to keep it to themselves privately due to their Left audience’s general conspiracy-phobia. Of course, I can accept it if it’s truly a medical condition that killed him. But I really have my suspicions. He was gaining more and more followers and admirers, especially after he did his tours in early 2020 before the Covid lockdowns. There’s a question on Israel that he answered quite splendidly that you can see here. Within the resurging online Left back then, he was beginning to become its best podcaster. He’s becoming the best and most effective articulator and disseminator of Left ideas online before Hasan Piker took off (who was not as good) among the young kids and he was becoming a unifying figure within the online Left. He’s becoming the center of it since he was friends with everybody. A lot of these online Left political content creators have spats with each other. But they never have spats with Michael Brooks. So he’s bringing them together. And I believe he was killed because of it, which was in the middle of George Floyd protests. So if I happen to be right about this, the people that killed Michael Brooks are invested in making sure that the online Left can never coalesce as a pressure group within the Democratic Party voting coalition and continue to focus more on their internal spats and factionalism. The bigger tragedy though is that I know that even if he remains alive, he will be caught in the middle of the debacle regarding the Russia-Ukraine conflict that caused a lot of splits between these online Left personalities. He’ll not be escaping those spats and divides.

Going back, I encountered more of Wade’s writings in Project Avalon and that is when I decided to open an account and reach out to him three years later, around mid-2015, and a conversation and correspondence that now stretched for about a decade has started. Though I don’t know why it took me three years to reach out to Wade. I think part of it is because I was still in college when I encountered his work for the first time and that I had fears in the consequences of reaching out to him and talking to him about myself. I don’t feel that I’m safe. I was a little more paranoid about this back then. But more importantly, I think I just know that I still have a lot to learn through having more life experiences and in doing further readings in the Internet before I can have the confidence to talk to Wade. I’m just discovering all of these things in roughly the same time period. I need the time to digest them and then gain the courage to reach out.

My goal in opening this account is to help shorten this process of digestion that I once went through before and make it easier for the entrance of a prospective leftist into “Wade’s World” since I can share my own life story and discuss ideas and experiences that may be familiar to this prospect.

I also remember that my personal difficulties accepting that I’m no longer in college and that I have to live in the “real world” and work in a capitalist workplace along with the beginnings of what I now know as my medical condition that these difficulties motivated me to reach out to Wade in Avalon for the first time. So they’re a blessing in disguise because otherwise I’ll be content to just lurk in Avalon and not reach out at all. I made the most out of it in making my very first post in there so that I can leave a good impression on him. I think it all kind of worked out in the end. Otherwise I wouldn’t be posting here ten years later.

My views on free energy since that time has not changed that drastically and my belief in the existence and ongoing suppression of free energy has only solidified year after year as our planet is heading into the abyss.

“Communizer” is in reference to communization theory, which I’ve been trying to study more now as I write this. Communization theory is basically believing that our existing capitalist society can move immediately to building communism that Marx and Engels wrote about in their writings without going through transitional stages like that of a dictatorship of the proletariat. The communizers believe that we can build communist relations almost immediately during a social revolution. This is a good article discussing this further. Given my belief in the existence of free energy, and with Wade Frazier’s concept of Epochal stages, with our civilization currently living in the industrial Fourth Epoch and with the potentiality of free energy starting the Fifth Epoch, it is kind of obvious that we do not need a transitional period anymore. And if the accounts of a free energy device already around in the 1900s is to be believed, a communist transition has been a possibility even during the time of the Bolshevik Revolution. This is the solution towards the question of immediate communization that communizers have been grappling with today. So this is why I’m using the word “communizer” rather than communist, aside from the negative connotations about the label “communist” that doesn’t help. This comes from my previous background as someone identifying their politics with the “far Left” for my entire adult life and me dabbling in political theory in my free time. I consider myself to be at least competent at this despite not graduating as a political science major. My college background did include studying political theory and this is how I encountered Noam Chomsky’s work for the first time. It is my classmate’s presentation about him around 2010 that introduced me to his work for the first time and I probably encountered the name but just didn’t recognize him through my elder sister who graduated as an English language major. My political views today are not as aligned with “Uncle Noam”, as Wade endearingly calls him, as it once was, for sure but without encountering Uncle Noam’s works, I wouldn’t be able to digest Wade’s own work properly. So I’ll be forever grateful to Uncle Noam’s contribution to my personal journey and political evolution.

A fictional work in the Internet that I am reluctant to reveal introduced me to the fringes of the communist left/left communism and as a big fan of this fictional work, I got introduced to the works of the Italian communist theorist, Amadeo Bordiga. I read his Wikipedia article way before, I’m sure, but I know very little of his ideas aside from what Wikipedia can tell me and as a “libertarian socialist” back then, I’m obligated to not like his “organic centralist” and “anti-democratic” views. My views are different now though I’m sure that no “Bordigist” organization is going to endorse my personal takes on the “class party” today, not to mention calling myself a “communizer”. But I was still in the cult of democracy for the longest time. Then I started to slowly learn more about Bordiga but it did not start by me reading Bordiga’s works himself (at first) but rather through the personal appeal of this fictional work and gaining glimpses of the authors’ belief system through their occasional statements in social media in a variety of issues or in particular passages in their occasional posts related to this fictional work. And then I started reading some of the works of one of Bordiga’s former proteges, Jacques Camatte, who just died this year. I learned more about what Marx called the “Gemeinwesen” through Camatte. The concept of the Gemeinwesen stuck with me because it reminded me of Wade’s Fifth Epoch. Another important work that introduced me to communization theory is the main thinker behind this fringe tendency himself, Gilles Dauve or Jean Barrot, and by reading one of the major communization publications, End Notes. My own interactions and engagements with online leftists, which became a more common feature of my online life from 2021, also helped shaped and strengthen my convictions in the futility of left-wing electoralism and activism towards a free energy revolution. My lingering social democratic hopes, despite understanding the futility of such a political route to even getting the most basic Sanderista/Corbynista economic goals, came from a personal belief in non-violence as a way to make free energy a reality. I also carried these false hopes in my own country’s politics and hoping that the 2022 presidential election might led to a miraculous victory by the Left’s main candidate back then against the combined force of the the ruling Right establishment and Right populism. And then I got exposed to the fractious debate within the Left on the Russia-Ukraine war that involved online Left influencers that I was, and continue to follow in social media today and also involving many Left politicians and activists that I also closely follow.

The epiphany for me that I’ve finally moved on from the almost all of the Left’s basic political viewpoints happened in early 2024 when I arrived early for a job interview and while I was waiting, I was reading End Notes 1’s “When Insurrections Die” by Gilles Dauve. (I did get the job on that day but I only lasted two months in it before resigning). This was a political evolution that started in late 2022 related to these online engagements that I was talking about and in relation to this fictional work in the Internet that I’m following but reading that essay was the moment that finally made it happen for me. It completed the transition. This is the work that gave permission to me to finally drop all of my lingering beliefs in anarchism and libertarian socialism as some kind of a more positive and benevolent version of radical Left ideology because they happen to have been espoused by the people that I admire like Uncle Noam and Chris Hedges. It may have been a more positive and benevolent vision than let’s say, Stalinism, but the anarchists and left-libertarians may have been the most ideologically trapped people in the Left today for a lot of reasons. But in relation to free energy, it is mainly because the furthest extent of their vision of a free society is that of a more ideologically pluralist and decentralized state management, which they’ll never call a state, with labor-time accounting. Gilles Dauve’s “accounting” on the Spanish Revolution in that article demolished my lingering beliefs about the supposedly great role of the anarchists in Spain doing a “social revolution” and the sabotage that the Stalinists did to make this social revolution fail when the fact is that it is the anarchists’ own ideological blindness and naivete because of the contradictions of their ideology that prevented them to tackle on the very thing that they thought they wanted to smash, the state. In fact, it is the opposite that has occurred. The decision of the Spanish anarchists to keep the Republican governmental apparatus intact is what led to the defeat of this so-called revolution from within because of the anarchist obsession of keeping a united front with the forces of the liberal bourgeoisie in order to fight a war in the name of “anti-fascism”. This passage below is the one that stuck with me;

But even so, some people might object, anarchists by their very nature are vaccinated against the statist virus. Isn’t anarchism the arch-enemy of the state? Yes, but…

Some Marxists can recite whole pages of The Civil War in France on the destruction of the state machine, and quote the passage from State and Revolution where Lenin says that one day cooks will administer society instead of politicians. But these same Marxists can practice the most servile state idolatry, once they come to see the state as the agent of progress or historical necessity. Because they imagine the future as a capitalist socialisation without capitalists, as a world still based on wage labour but egalitarian, democratised and planned, everything prepares them to accept a state (transitional, to be sure) and to go off to war for a capitalist state they see as bad, against another they see as worse.

Anarchism overestimates state power by regarding authority as the main enemy, and at the same time underestimates the state’s force of inertia.

The state is the guarantor, but not the creator, of social relationships. It represents and unifies capital, it is neither capital’s motor nor its centrepiece. From the undeniable fact that the Spanish masses were armed after July 1936, anarchism deduced that the state was losing its substance. But the substance of the state resides not in institutional forms, but in its unifying function. The state ensures the tie which human beings cannot and dare not create among themselves, and creates a web of services which are both parasitic and real.

In the summer of 1936, the state apparatus may have seemed derelict in Republican Spain, because it only subsisted as a potential framework capable of picking up the pieces of capitalist society and re-arranging them one day. In the meantime, it continued to live, in social hibernation. Then it gained new strength when the relations opened up by subversion were loosened or torn apart. It revived its organs, and, the occasion permitting, assumed control over those bodies which subversion had caused to emerge. What had been seen as an empty shell showed itself capable not only of revival, but of actually emptying out the parallel forms of power in which the revolution thought it had best embodied itself.

The CNT’s ultimate justification of its role comes down to the idea that the government no longer really had power, because the workers’ movement had taken power de facto.

“…the government has ceased to be a force oppressing the working-class, in the same way that the state is no longer the organism dividing society into classes. And if CNT members work within the state and government, the people will be less and less oppressed.”16

No less than Marxism, anarchism fetishizes the state and imagines it as being incarnated in a place. Blanqui had already thrown his little armed flock into attacks on city halls or on barracks, but he at least never claimed to base his actions on the proletarian movement, only on a minority that would awaken the people. A century later, the CNT declared the Spanish state to be a phantom relative to the tangible reality of the “social organisations” (i.e. militias, unions). But the existence of the state, its raison d’être, is to paper over the shortcomings of “civil” society by a system of relations, of links, of a concentration of forces, an administrative, police, judicial, and military network which goes “on hold” as a backup in times of crisis, awaiting the moment when a police investigator can go sniffing into the files of the social worker. The revolution has no Bastille, police station or governor’s mansion to “take”: its task is to render harmless or destroy everything from which such places draw their substance.

This is another passage that hit home to me, seen below;

The alternative upheld by Bordiga: “Shall we take over the factory, or take over power?” (Il Soviet, February 20, 1920) can and must be superseded. We don’t say: it does not matter who manages production, whether an executive or a council, because what counts is to have production without value. We say: as long as production for value continues, as long as it is separated from the rest of life, as long as humankind does not collectively produce its ways and means of existence, as long as there is an “economy”, any council is bound to lose its power to an executive. This is where we differ both from “councilists” and “Bordigists”, and why we are likely to be called Bordigists by the former, and councilists by the latter.

The anarchists are trapped in “capitalist socialization” and not abolishing the value-form. Wade calls it “shuffling the decks of scarcity” and ALL political ideologies today do the same thing. Not even the communizers are exempted.

But the realization for me here is understanding that the anarchist solution does not work in the same way that I still imagined that it can work given the limitations of the time period and the circumstances. It is the moralization of the conflict that affected my thinking, with anarchists being the “good guys” and Stalinists being the “bad guys”. At that time, I already understand that the Bolshevik solution does not work through its own reasons that the adherents of the communist Left was able to articulate succinctly. But it’s the anarchist version that continued to baffle me as to what went wrong. It does not anymore. The pieces have finally fit in my head. There are no “good guys” vs “bad guys” in the Spanish Civil War story. It’s all a tragedy from its very beginning. Looking at it, the only available route for the anarchists to win the civil war without succumbing back to capitalist restoration, at least succumbing not too quickly, is for them to betray the very principles on which their ideology is based on and to forcibly capture and destroy state power by completely destroying the state’s institutional forms as well as to move towards building communist forms of exchange and organization, which is inconceivable and inaccessible to them. But the anarchists did not do anything remotely close to both and they end up opting for collaboration with bourgeois political and social forces in the name of “anti-fascism”. It became apparent that collectivization and socialization is very different from communization. That is what I am not getting before. So this changed my thinking about everything. My lingering romanticization of Spain 1936 ended there.

With that complete evolution, I realized that a synthesis of the Italian Left’s language that inspired the communization theory with Wade’s free energy beliefs that I share with him that has given me a justification to Leftists as to why I am comfortable to continue working in a capitalist workplace and why I can now allow myself the permission of trying to gain personal wealth and to become rich. There has been an ongoing conflict in my brain between the New Age prosperity gospel beliefs that I acquired when I entered college in the late 2000s and with the “socialism” that I acquired in early 2010s, with Wade’s life story involving evil capitalists not helping matters, and it was something that I was never truly able to reconcile and acknowledge in my mind until after Covid. Now I can reconcile them. I can accept that working for a living and more is completely fine because not only it allows me to help other people in my life willingly but it also gives me the tools to be able to write things like this. This synthesis in my brain has also given me the permission why I can be more of a “quietist” in today’s issues rather than an “activist”. Activism is the last thing that you want to do in introducing free energy to the world where the power discrepancy between ourselves and the Powers That Be that suppress the introduction of this technology are astronomical. They cannot be fought through barricades and bullets. And they also cannot be fought through “mass movements” and “direct action” either. People in the free energy milieu have tried the mass movement approach and their faces all fell flat to the floor after doing it. This is the greatest suppression effort that our world has ever seen because the people leading the suppression effort knows what’s at stake. Wade himself was part of such mass movement efforts and seen how they failed and why they failed. So we don’t have any path of salvation here. Working alone as renegade inventors in garages in the middle of nowhere hoping that you’re not going to get caught doesn’t work either.

I believe Wade’s effort to gather a “choir” that “sing the songs of abundance” has a great chance of working. But Wade needs the people and they need to put in the work. I am not in this “choir” and chooses not to be in it, but I can help bring potential people in it.

Going back, this synthesis in my head allows me to identify as “apolitical” or “libertarian” depending on the circumstance in public and to comfortably reject the official communisms and socialisms of today. I can even link this to Amadeo Bordiga’s own life story as to why he left politics after getting imprisoned with Gramsci during the height of Italian fascism. Many “Marxists” thought that his postwar writings and criticisms on activism were partly to justify why he himself got quiet during Italy’s fascist era while a lot of them are in the Resistance movement. Well, it’s more than just that. I think that he just developed some kind of a proto-understanding about something that took a Wade Frazier of today to articulate. And that is that all the prevailing ideologies of today are scarcity-based state management and population management ideologies. “Dictatorship” and “democracy” are not that different. So we cannot build on these ideologies in developing a more correct framework of thinking revolving around free energy.

The “communizer” part is more of having acquiring an online political identity than anything. But it’s the Italian Left that has allowed me to “leave the Left” and say comfortably that “I’m not a leftist” because I cannot continue to identify myself with a fundamentally capitalistic political compass and be placed either on its Left flank or Right flank. There is an uncompromising energy-based determinism that I can now embrace. Wade Frazier’s discussion of Epochal stages was something that I accepted but I did not have an existing academic political theory translation available for it as a guide until I encountered the works of the Italian communist Left tradition. It is the Italian Left that dashed my lingering beliefs in left-wing activism but everything did not truly sink in and click into place until on that fateful day in March 2024. And now more than a year later, after unsuccessfully trying to influence the thinking of leftists in other social media platforms that I am in towards a more energy-centric thinking due to the limitations of these platforms and the very ideology of these people that I’ve talked to, I am trying this approach.

We need free energy. But we want it to be thinkable and imaginable for people first. Those platforms that I’ve been in do not allow me to do that. And I have to self-censor as well so my arguments have big holes in them and I have to get abstract. Through this platform, I can be more open and straightforward about it.

My goal through this and my future writings is to help people that know their Left theory and consider themselves on the Left to get into “Wade’s World” through using their own lens on viewing the world and then to encourage them to go beyond the limitations of their Left ideology.

The Italian Left, in my opinion, provides these transitionary tools towards thinking past the Left vs Right paradigm, which is a product of capitalism, and then towards free energy as the critical missing ingredient that unlocks the possibilities of communization.

We’ll also explore other things to talk about that helps makes the Fifth Epoch more imaginable but I can be boring in trying to take readers deep into the political theory. Wade considers “scientific training” to be a critical part of getting into the “choir” and his website and writings do not require for people to have advanced knowledge in the sciences in order to get that training. He’s trying to make it very accessible. On my end, I’m not going to pretend that I am scientifically trained enough but I can help prospective leftists in terms of what I can call “political deprogramming”. It is about dropping that political identity as someone from the Left willingly and going past the tribalism. We cannot let these available tools that are given to us become our new political identity.

However, those that consider themselves to be on the Right are very welcome here. I share a lot of their beliefs on the existence of God and the afterlife, hating the cancel culture and “woke-ism” perpetrated by college-educated elite liberals and their allies in the progressive bourgeoisie, the suspicion on central banks, Big Tech and Big Pharma and deconstructing the administrative state. I will be glad to write more in the future about ideas as to where I may align with the so-called Right and then encourage them to go beyond the limitations of their own Right ideology. Using Wade’s Epochal stages, the main issue I have with the so-called Right is in terms of how the broad Right ideology is more firmly attached to the Third Epoch and romanticizing parts of it as some form of instinctual but unacknowledged anti-capitalism. This is understandable given the historical development of liberalism on the cusp of industrialization and decline of feudalism. There is an underlying tension between the Third Epoch and Fourth Epoch within the Right, especially the American Right, while the Left is more firmly entrenched in Fourth Epoch thinking already.

But we are looking to get past them all and get to Fifth Epoch thinking. Thinking about the Fifth Epoch is part of making the Fifth Epoch happen.

Those that consider their politics as “independent” or in the Center are even more welcome, to say the least.

A lot of these writings will not make sense to a lot of people and I do not seek a mass audience. Wade’s efforts to form the “choir” are not designed for that. But Wade just wants to get the right people that can “sing the song of abundance” with him and that song will then resonate and listened to by a bigger group of people that then can bring free energy into the open and for the world to start communization the correct way.

So let’s get into it.

Best Wishes,

The Free Energy Communizer [also Communizer, Servant Limestone (SL), Limestone/LM, Free Energy Dude/FED, Serg]